When executed properly, the costs associated with a rate protection plan like LockFlex should be more than offset by the increased returns it generates.
Lenders use a variety of hedging techniques to reduce their exposure to systemic and interest-rate risk. Hedging is sound business practice, especially in mortgage banking. But after decades of predominantly falling or stable rates, many secondary-marketing managers have had limited experience managing hedges through sustained rising-rate or highly volatile environments. The difference between a profitable mortgage lender and a highly profitable one lies not just in the tools used to minimize risk, but in knowing which tools to deploy and when. Lenders who fail to use the right instrument at the right time risk substandard profitability and lower production. One of the most effective instruments available today is LockFlex, also known as a rate-protection plan or float-down lock.
What Is LockFlex?
LockFlex is a lock structure that gives borrowers exactly what they want: protection against rising rates, plus the ability to capture lower rates if the market improves during the processing period. It’s essentially a put option offered to the borrower for little upfront fee. Borrowers buying or refinancing a home typically need every dollar for down payment and closing costs, so they don’t want to pay cash for an option on a loan they may not yet qualify for. The lender finances the cost of the embedded option instead and recovers it through pricing rather than an explicit fee.
How it works. Assume the 30-day mandatory price on the rate sheet is 6.5% at -1 point. Under LockFlex, the lender sets a cap at that same rate and points, then adds a modest pricing adjustment, typically 0.25 points upfront for a 30-day LockFlex. If rates fall to 5.5% at -1 point before documents are drawn, the borrower gets 5.5% at -1 point. If rates rise, the borrower is protected at the original 6.5% at -1 point. If rates hold steady, the borrower closes at the original rate and points. The float-down is usually exercised once, typically when documents are drawn, and then converts to a normal locked loan. The borrower knows the worst-case rate and points from day one while still participating in any market improvement.
Pricing. The float-down can be applied to any mortgage product, and because it’s more valuable to the borrower than a standard mandatory lock, the lender prices it slightly higher. Using the rate sheet as the base, a 30-day LockFlex runs roughly 0.25 points upfront above the standard price (or the exact adjustment shown on the lender’s LockFlex rate sheet), with longer terms of 60, 90, or 120 days carrying correspondingly higher adjustments. That small premium covers the cost of the put options the lender must buy to hedge the embedded float-down feature.
Advantages of LockFlex
LockFlex brings more volume by attracting borrowers who need longer protection periods, anywhere from 90 to 365 days, who might otherwise float or shop elsewhere. It also drives higher pull-through, since borrowers with a one-time float-down right are far less likely to renegotiate or fall out when rates improve. That, in turn, lowers overall hedge costs by eliminating a growing number of expensive pair-offs that occur when loans are renegotiated or fall out after the lender has already sold TBA coverage. And it offers a real competitive edge: peace of mind that standard locks and informal renegotiation policies simply can’t match. Taken together, the incremental business, reduced fallout, and lower hedge costs typically more than offset the initial option premium.
LockFlex vs. Extended Locks vs. Builder Commitments
Pipeline managers need to treat each commitment type separately, since each behaves differently and must be modeled, tracked, and hedged in its own bucket. Extended locks, meaning locks longer than 90 days with no float-down, carry higher fallout probability and must be hedged more conservatively with option coverage. Builder commitments are options purchased by the builder for a pool of unknown future borrowers, with the builder paying the option premium. LockFlex and other float-down locks, by contrast, are individual loan options with a defined lock date, term, and amount.
Why a Simple Renegotiation Policy Falls Short
Some lenders still rely on an informal policy of renegotiating if the market improves by a point. In today’s regulatory environment, with fixed LO compensation and equal treatment of all borrowers, that policy effectively gives every borrower a free float-down while the lender holds no option coverage against it. The alternative, refusing to renegotiate at all, just sends borrowers to another lender, especially now that rate information is so easy for them to find. Either way, renegotiation attempts and fallout become common in any market rally, and the lender ends up offering a rate-protection plan with no way to recover its cost.
The result: the lender forgoes the price differential it would have collected on a properly priced LockFlex, incurs pair-off losses on TBA hedges when loans are rewritten at lower rates, and loses borrowers to competitors anyway.
Proper Hedging Is Essential
To offer LockFlex profitably, the lender must build options into its pipeline-risk-management toolbox, primarily put and call options on mortgage-backed securities, and, when appropriate, options on Treasuries paired with TBA forward sales. Failure to value, monitor, and hedge the embedded puts will produce losses. When the options are correctly sized and the product correctly priced, the economics work in the lender’s favor.
In basis points of loan volume, the illustrative economics break down this way: new business generated by LockFlex contributes 15 bp, fallout reduction contributes another 15 bp, and lower overall hedge costs add 5 bp, for a total benefit of 35 bp. Against that, the cost of LockFlex option coverage runs about 25 bp, leaving a net gain of roughly 10 bp.
For example, if the value of new business is 150 basis points and LockFlex helps generate 10% more of it, that’s 15 basis points right there, not counting other fees. If fallout on the new product drops by 10%, that’s another 15 basis points. Add five basis points from reduced overall hedge costs, and the total benefit reaches 35 basis points, comfortably ahead of the 25 basis points it costs to offer LockFlex in the first place.
Conclusion
In both float-downs and renegotiations, the borrower ultimately has the option to get a lower rate down the road. Because the borrower holds that option, the pipeline manager needs to protect the company by using the right amount of option contracts, rather than forward TBA trades alone, to shield the pipeline and the firm’s margin from the fallout and costs that come with declining rates.
Mortgage lenders today have to be meticulous about managing their pipelines: stabilizing earnings, growing production, and minimizing risk, all while navigating a protracted and volatile rate environment. Correctly priced and hedged, LockFlex is one of the more powerful tools available for that job. Using the rate sheet as the base, adding a transparent option premium, and covering the risk with the right mix of options and TBA trades, the costs of the program are more than offset by the added volume, higher pull-through, and lower hedge expense it delivers. Borrowers get valuable protection with little cash outlay, and lenders get a competitive product that strengthens rather than erodes profitability.
Dean Brown is the Founder and CEO of QuantosIT.com
80,000+ mortgage professionals get this every weekday morning.
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact